The Seattle Cop and the Punch

The race baiters in Seattle, Washington are already alleging racism in the altercation between a Seattle PD officer and two black female teenagers. The girls crossed the street illegally; the officer attempted to arrest them. The girls resisted; each one, in turn, jumped on the officer in an attempt to prevent him from subduing and handcuffing the other. The officer punched one of the offenders in the face. Even that did not end the girls’ attacks on the officer.

The incident was captured on video, which you can view here.

As a former law enforcement officer, I probably would have done the same thing or “worse.” In fact, I was trained to strike the offender in non-lethal areas with a metal baton when he/she could not be subdued by less violent means and use deadly force when justified. Think how that would have played out on Youtube!

Before you criticize the officer, consider the following:

1. There is ALWAYS a gun at the fight. Many police officers have been physically overcome, then shot with their own weapon. For that reason, an officer CANNOT afford to lose the fight and is justified, in a legal arrest, to use whatever force is necessary to complete it.

2. A female, even a teenager, is just as capable of causing physical harm, and even death, as a male. Women are just as capable of concealing a deadly weapon like a knife or box cutter. Personally, I would rather fight a man.

3. Two-on-one is never good, especially when one offender attacks from behind while the officer is occupied with the other. The officer is particularly at risk during an attack from the rear.

4. Every citizen has the right to resist an illegal arrest, even to the point of using deadly force. But, if the citizen resists, he/she takes full responsibility for the immediate consequences of his/her resistance. However petty you might consider the offense, jaywalking is apparently illegal in Seattle. (Incidentally, the law is intended to protect the pedestrian.)

5. A police officer is permitted to use only that level of force necessary to effect the arrest. Obviously, the two females did not respond to verbal commands.  The women resisted the initial physical effort to restrain them, even helping each other to escape the officer’s grasp. Given the options left to the officer, the teenager is lucky, frankly, that he only punched her.

6. All other considerations are irrelevant. Specifically, the color of the offender or the officer is not relevant when considering whether or not any involved party acted correctly.

Finally, some have said that the officer would have drawn his gun had he truly felt threatened. To the contrary, a weapon out of the holster is a serious and, sometimes, irreversible escalation of force. That the officer defended himself and continued the arrest by hand while facing multiple offenders, alone, in a hostile crowd, is evidence of great control and restraint. By leaving his weapon in its holster, the Seattle cop jeopardized his own welfare to protect the lives of the offenders and bystanders.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
  • http://naturalbornconservative@gmail.com larrymwalkerjr

    I understand where you’re coming from, but what I don’t get is why this cop was singlehandedly trying to detain 5 people for jaywalking. According to the story he stopped one guy for jaywalking and then saw the four girls jaywalking in the same spot and went after them. If he saw 50 people jaywalking at the same time would he have gone after all of them? How smart was it really for one cop, without backup, to try to detain all five of them? In that regard, I think he recklessly endangered himself and other citizens. He didn’t protect and serve anyone from anything.

    Race will only come up because he was white, they were black. I’m not saying it was a racial incident, but that question will always come up in cases like this.

    What I particularly don’t like is the way he put his hands on her. I don’t think that is ever called for in non-violent confrontation. If she was 6 years old would he have done the same thing? If she was 90 years old would he have acted the same? I don’t think age matters.

    As you know, if you so much as touch another person without their permission, it’s assault. Did this cop think he could just assault someone in a crowd and that it wouldn’t be a problem? Did she steal a car or something? Did she rob a bank? No, she jaywalked. For God sake either call for backup or just let them go.

    The girls should be charged with resisting, and interfering and the officer should be reprimanded. And I bet he won’t make that mistake again.

  • http://www.talkgwinnett.com BobG

    Thank you for the comments, Larry.

    How smart was it for the two girls to resist arrest for jaywalking? I will bet that jaywalking in that area is dangerous. I will bet that the officer probably intended to write a citation or a warning and it was the teenagers’ conduct that caused the officer to escalate to arrest.

    The majority of an officer’s enforcement actions are initiated alone, without backup. In a large percentage of the calls on which an officer is sent, he is sent alone; at least, at the beginning. The officer’s actions in this instance are not unusual.

    The fact that someone will raise the issue of race does not indicate that race was an issue. The fact that many blacks jump straight to race is unfortunate, at best. You can thank the bastardization of Martin Luther King’s message by the likes of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton for that.

    Some of the worst fights that I was ever in as a cop was with females (black females, actually). Further, this was NOT a non-violent confrontation. The teenagers escalated the incident to a violent, physical confrontation when they resisted arrest. In the Seattle incident, there was no “weaker sex,” no ladies deserving of preferred treatment. You may have honor and respect for all women, but not all women deserve honor and respect.

    Conversely, there is little respect for law enforcement; especially among blacks “in the street.” That the two girls resisted in the way they did came as no surprise at all.

    A legal arrest is not an assault. In a situation where the officer only used that amount of force necessary to make the arrest, any discussion of “assault” is ludicrous. Your perspective is amusing… why you have no criticism of the teenagers’ assault on the officer is interesting.

    Finally, I pray to God that the officer is willing to “make that mistake” again. The officer who fails to gain quick and overwhelming control of a situation will soon be injured or dead.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention The Seattle Cop and the Punch | BobGriggs.com -- Topsy.com

  • http://www.politicalpill.net jfaillo

    What I seen in the video is resisting arrest.Against the law.
    I saw assault on a police officer. Against the law. what I didn’t see was the jwalking. If an officer approaches you driving or walking or whatever you have to follow his instructions. It doesn’t matter if he’s right or wrong because the courts are where you go to solve those issues.
    The thing that I saw that was most revealing to me was a couple of girls that were never taught to respect anyone and they feel like they are above the law and are spoiled to do whatever the want because they holler victimization and if that don’t work more than likley they will holler race

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: BlueHost Coupon | Best CD Rates, Shared Hosting and Singlehop review