It is crucial to recall the reality that lies behind the rhetoric. Denouncing "those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents" comes ill from a man whose flagship legislation, the Freedom of Choice Act, will impose abortion, including partial-birth abortion, on every state in the Union. It seems the era of Hope is to be inaugurated with a slaughter of the innocents.

Barack Obama inauguration: this Emperor has no clothes, it will all end in tears :: Gerald Warner

In addition, I look forward to working with Congress to restore U.S. financial support for the U.N. Population Fund.  By resuming funding to UNFPA, the U.S. will be joining 180 other donor nations working collaboratively to reduce poverty, improve the health of women and children, prevent HIV/AIDS and provide family planning assistance to women in 154 countries.

The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151b(f)(1)), prohibits nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that receive Federal funds from using those funds "to pay for the performance of abortions as a method of family planning, or to motivate or coerce any person to practice abortions." 

The August 1984 announcement by President Reagan of what has become known as the "Mexico City Policy" directed the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to expand this limitation and withhold USAID funds from NGOs that use non-USAID funds to engage in a wide range of activities, including providing advice, counseling, or information regarding abortion, or lobbying a foreign government to legalize or make abortion available. 

The Mexico City Policy was in effect from 1985 until 1993, when it was rescinded by President Clinton.  President George W. Bush reinstated the policy in 2001, implementing it through conditions in USAID grant awards, and subsequently extended the policy to "voluntary population planning" assistance provided by the Department of State. [Source: Presidential Memorandum]

The White House – Blog Post – Statement released after the President rescinds "Mexico City Policy"

There is no greater judgment reserved for the damned than there is for Barack Obama.

Sen. Barack Obama’s views on life issues ranging from abortion to embryonic stem cell research mark him as not merely a pro-choice politician, but rather as the most extreme pro-abortion candidate to have ever run on a major party ticket.

Robert George : Obama’s Abortion Extremism – Townhall.com

It struck me that, if we as a nation condone the killing of “born alive aborted” babies, we are baby’s breath away from “aborting” a full-term infant after birth. The “logic” (or insanity) is the same.

Under Obama’s policy, it no longer matters if the infant to be aborted is inside the womb or outside. All that matters is the mother “chooses” to kill the baby.

If a woman can reconfirm or “re-choose” to kill a baby after its live birth (albeit during an abortion attempt), it is an easy argument to say that she can make her initial choice to “abort” a baby after its live birth.

In most civilized societies, the intentional killing of a living human being (other than a state-sanctioned execution) is considered murder. However, if you ask the man who could be our next President, such an act would simply be the logical extension of a woman’s “choice” to avoid being, as Obama put it, “punished with a baby.”

If it was up to the abominable Obama, the to-be-aborted little baby, Gianna Jessen, would have been turned into worm dirt 31 years ago. Thankfully, Mr. Change and Mr. Hope wasn’t around back then to lay his liberal legislative death-dealing pen to Ms. Jessen’s fate—and the world is a better place for it.

So, who is Gianna Jessen?

Doug Giles :: Townhall.com :: If It Was Up to Obama, This Woman Would be Dead