The goal of the group, as declared by controversial Afrocentrist Jacob Carruthers,  was to use African-centered education in the Chicago area to promote a separatist movement within the U.S., an African “state within a state.”

Carruthers’s goal is to use African-centered education to recreate a separatist universe within America, a kind of state-within-a-state. The rites of passage movement is central to the plan. Carruthers sees enemies on every part of the political spectrum, from conservatives, to liberals, to academic leftists, all of whom reject advocates of Kemetic civilization, like himself, as dangerous and academically irresponsible extremists. Carruthers sees all these groups as deluded captives of white supremacist Eurocentric culture. Therefore the only safe place for Africans living in the United States (i.e. American blacks) is outside the mental boundaries of our ineradicably racist Eurocentric civilization.

If Obama wasn’t specifically aware of SSAVC’s  extreme views, he apparently shared them.

“[I]n 1995, the same year Obama assumed control of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, he publicly rejected ‘the unrealistic politics of integrationist assimilation…’,” which is exactly what Jeremiah Wright espoused and the SSAVC promoted.

How do we know this? Obama himself told us.

Obama is a political experiment; an attempt to measure how much socialism and radicalism you are willing to accept in the name of political correctness. Obama is too dangerous to be President.

Read the article: Wright 101 by Stanley Kurtz on National Review Online

So why is Obama just one domestic terrorist away from the White House?

If McCain can’t establish guilt by agreement, that’s in large part because Obama’s temperament is considerably less fiery than his philosophy. This makes him the perfect vehicle for 1960s radicalism: his cool trot will get radicals on his shoulders to the same destination far more quickly than their unseemly stampede.

The American Spectator

Obama’s racist attitudes weren’t just the product of youth and inexperience. He continued to fuel this deep-rooted bigotry by sitting under the tutelage of a hate-spewing preacher, Jeremiah Wright. The fact that, for two decades, Obama never heard a word that caused him to question Wright’s racist teachings is further proof that Obama holds these hate-filled attitudes to today.

Obama says that the hate doesn’t go away. “It formed a counter-narrative buried deep within each person and at the center of which stood white people — some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives.”

Phyllis Schlafly :: Townhall.com :: The Audacity of Obama

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama’s loose cannon of a spiritual adviser, stole the wife of a parishioner – after the man sought Wright’s help in saving his troubled marriage, the former husband told friends.

Although I am sure that it the coveting of “thy neighbor’s wife” happens on both sides of the racial divide, it is very disconcerting when your trusted teacher of black liberation theology “liberates” your own wife.

BARACK’S REV. ‘STOLE A WIFE’ – New York Post

I have wondered, given the incredible progress in race relations over the past three decades, if blacks would ever be able to just “let it go” and recognize the facts. Innumerable black men and women have risen to positions of power, influence and affluence in this country and at a time when the white culture is still the dominant culture, at least in simple numbers. If one black man can succeed any black man can, despite the claims of the “activists” that it isn’t possible, simply because of color.

The recent discussions of “black liberation theology” and the “black church” that have arisen out of the relationship between Democrat Presidential candidate Barack Obama and his pastor of twenty-plus years, Jeremiah Wright, have reawakened my desire to understand the “black experience”– and my passion to reject intellectual dishonesty wherever it appears. And an incredible article by James Solis has expressed in much better terms how the “black liberation theology” that Rev. Wright claims to be the foundation of his ministry can never achieve liberation for its adherents.

From the Solis article:

Black Theology, as a species of Liberation Theology, purports to be the theological energy behind the Black Power movement, a movement intended to liberate blacks from their continuing oppression under whites. But, at the same time, this very theology tells its adherents (even if only tacitly) that they must always be oppressed; they can never really be liberated – not if they are to remain in relationship with their Black God.

Because the 2008 Presidential race is the talk of the day, and because it is highly likely that Barack Obama will be the Democrat nominee and have a shot at the White House, it would do us well to understand Rev. Wright, Dr. James Cone (Wright’s mentor) and the message under which Obama and his family have sat for over two decades.