Liberals continue to have difficulty with Sarah Palin. It is funny how, to a liberal Palin opponent, even a “positive” becomes a “negative.” From the Financial Times article linked below:

“Contrary to her promises, she has taken no initiatives to restrict abortion rights or to introduce the teaching of creationism in schools.”

Now, this liberal writer doesn’t want to restrict abortion rights or see creationism taught, and for Palin’s “lack of initiative” this reporter would normally praise her.

But, no; instead the writer criticizes Palin for her failure to keep a promise. So this writer would prefer that Palin remain true to her fundamentalist Christian beliefs? I doubt it.

Liberals are confused because they are the sons and daughters of the “father of confusion.”

Palin is a true threat; not in herself but in what she represents.

FT.com / Comment & analysis / Analysis – Mrs Underestimated